Both Haiti and India reveal the rich irony of poverty definitions

RASHMEE ROSHAN LALL July 11, 2014

5B636D50-BA57-486A-8DB2-92DCC4D3C99F_w640_r1_sExtreme poverty has fallen in Haiti, according to figures quoted by the World Bank’s managing director, but in India, poverty is up because there’s a whole new definition of the condition.

In Haiti, extreme poverty is down six percentage points – from 31% in 2000 to 24% in 2012. (Click here to read my blog on the subject).

In India, it was 29.5% in 2011-12. But that’s according to new criteria recommended by a committee headed by a former chairman of the prime minister’s Economic Advisory Council, Chakravarthi Rangarajan. It set a very high standard to measure poverty, namely that if a rural family of five spends less than $80 a month or an urban family less than $150, they must be deemed poor. This would make 363 million Indians, or 29.5%, poor in 2011-12. Not a great report card for a country with so much potential and aspiration, but rather better than in 2010. Then, going by the new criteria, 38.2% of Indians were poor. Clearly, even the high bar cannot erase the encouraging reality of India’s poverty statistics –  they’ve improved enormously within a two-year period.

I’m not sure what criteria have been applied to the new survey of Haitian households but hopefully, the bar was not set way at the very bottom of the scale of human existence.

(Tomorrow: The business of welfarism matters more than definitions of poverty)